Anyone who has marked exams on a mass scale for their employer can share with you first hand stories of just how different two teachers, sitting side by side, freshly trained for using the same rubric, actively engaged in the evaluation process conversation, can score an actual exam. On a six point scale, I have witnessed a section of markers give a graduation exam essay a 4, while their colleagues all scored it a 6. I'll let @TeachAtwal do the math for you on that, but rest assured the entrance into any number of post secondary institutions will be grossly affected by both of those scores.
Anyone who has selected a team of 15 kids from 60 trying out knows that while experience and strategy help organize and simplify the process, no amount of fretting will guarantee making the "right" choice about who to keep.
Clear cut evidence of our subjectivity and unique perception of reality surrounds us each school day and yet we stand behind our PLO's, our rubrics, our standardization, our marks books, and our systems, with arms crossed and chin lifted in defiance. What are we so afraid of? Do we value ourselves so little? Have we really lost touch with anything that can't be counted?
If we want to empower students we need to lead by example, starting with the admission of our own weaknesses and imperfections. There is no "best practice" for all kids, there is no objective robotic way to instruct or evaluate that will create a "fair" playing field for all students. The best any of us can hope to do is just that, our best. Within our own "reality" and our growing skill and knowledge set, in interaction with the complexity that is another human being's reality, set into an ever growing community of learners with both individual and collective needs... all we can do is what we think is best for those involved in that moment. If we remove the human element, we remove the most powerful part of what we do.
quote via @gcouros
No comments:
Post a Comment